|
Category |
DISTINGUISHED (4) |
PROFICIENT (3) |
APPRENTICE (2) |
NOVICE (1) |
|
Objective
or Thesis |
The video expressed clearly at the
beginning the goal or objective of the report. |
The video expressed clearly the goal or
objective of the report, but it was not apparent in the beginning
segments. |
The video expressed the goal or objective
of the report, but it was not clearly stated but inferred. |
The video failed to express the goal or
objective of the report and seemed to lack a specific focus. |
|
Titles &
Credits |
All titles and credits are accurate,
legible and draw the viewer's attention. |
Most titles and credits are accurate,
legible and draw the viewer's attention. |
Some titles and credits are accurate,
legible and draw the viewer's attention. |
Few (less than 75%) titles and credits
are accurate, legible and draw the viewer's attention. |
Content
Facts & information |
All facts and information presented was
accurate & complete. |
Most facts and information presented was
accurate & complete. |
Some facts and information presented was
accurate & complete. |
Few facts and information presented was
accurate & complete. |
Videography-
Techniques
Clarity |
Video did not rock/shake and the focus
was excellent throughout |
Video occasionally had slight movement
but the focus was excellent throughout |
Video was unstable or the focus was poor
throughout |
Video was unsteady and moved while the
focus was poor. |
Videography
Interest |
Many different "takes", camera angles,
sound effects, and/or careful use of zoom provided variety in the
video. |
Some variation in "takes", camera angles,
sound effects, and/or careful use of zoom provided variety in the
video. |
Few different "takes", camera angles,
sound effects, and/or careful use of zoom provided variety in the
video. Had a sameness to it. |
Most shots taken from one camera angle,
and the zoom was not well used. |
|
Audio |
The video's sound was sufficiently loud
and clear at all times. |
The video's sound sometimes faded out and
was clear part of the time. |
The video's sound was poor and not clear
at all times. |
The video's sound was insufficient and
difficult to make out. |
Style &
Organization |
The video was well conceived and shows
good organization of the content. |
The video shows good organization of the
content. |
The video was not well conceived or shows
poor organization of the content. |
The video was poorly done and shows
little or no organization of the content. |
|
Knowledge |
The video demonstrates a thorough
knowledge of the subject investigated. |
The video demonstrates good knowledge of
the subject investigated. |
The video demonstrates some knowledge of
the subject investigated. |
The video demonstrates very little
knowledge of the subject investigated. |
|
Resources |
The video shows the use of a variety of
sources of information which have been cited in a bibliography. |
The video shows the use of several
sources of information which have been cited in a bibliography. |
The video shows very little variety in
the sources of information which have been cited in a bibliography. |
The video looks as if one or two sources
only were used in it's preparation. |
|
Preparation |
The student had notes about all the
events and facts s/he wished to include in his video before
beginning. Notes were submitted. |
The student had notes about all the
events and facts s/he wished to include in his video before
beginning. Notes were submitted. |
The student had notes about most (~75%)
of the events and facts s/he wished to include in his video before
beginning. Notes were submitted. |
The student had not prepared adequate
notes before beginning or notes were not submitted. |