The list is designed in an interesting and imaginative way. The art is
colorful and detailed.
|
The list is designed in an interesting way. The art is colorful.
|
The list is colorful, but lacks detail and imagination.
|
The list lacks color. It shows an attempt at detail.
|
|
The list demonstrates a logical plan of organization and coherence. It gives
a vivid idea of the topic. It is easy to read.
|
The list demonstrates an acceptable plan of organization. It gives an idea
of the topic. It is easy to read.
|
The list demonstrates an attempt to organize the topic. It gives a general
idea about the topic.
|
The list lacks a plan of organization. It minimally addresses the topic.
|
|
The ideas on the list include clear and understandable information about the
topic (what, where, when, why).
|
The ideas on the list include satisfactory information about the topic
(what, where, when, why).
|
The ideas on the list give some understandable information about the topic
(what, where, when, why).
|
The list on the project convey little or no sense of information about the
topic (what, where, when, why).
|
|
The list contains few or no errors in mechanics.
|
The list contains errors in mechanics that do not interfere with
communication.
|
The list contains errors in mechanics that interfere with communication.
|
The list contains many errors in mechanics that seriously interfere with
communication.
|