|
Element |
Rubric For Editorial - Commentary Essay |
|
|
DISTINGUISHED (4) |
PROFICIENT (3) |
APPRENTICE (2) |
NOVICE (1) |
|
Voice |
Engages reader’s interest in a lively fashion. Writer’s voice is
forceful. |
Writing attracts reader’s interest. Writer’s voice indicates
engagement with the issue. |
Opening writing is correct, if pedestrian, not particularly attracting
interest. Voice is weak. |
Writing does not engage reader. Has no sense of writer’s interest or
commitment to the position taken. No voice evident. |
|
Context |
Provides appropriate context in an efficient manner. |
Provides enough context to assist the reader. |
Confusing or weak context provided. |
Little or no context provided. |
|
Position |
Formulates a position on the issue in a clearly stated and
thought-provoking thesis. |
States a position on the issue in a clear manner. |
Stated position on the issue is somewhat vague or indefinite. |
Position is unclear, absent, or contradictory to the claims made. |
|
Supports |
Offers specific reasons and/or evidence for the position that conveys
writer’s own understanding and/or insight. |
Provides adequate, though slightly vague, reasons and/or evidence for
the position that suggests understanding of the issue. |
Provides less than adequate or contradictory reasons or evidence for
the position. |
Offers only the most general reasons or evidence or none for the
position. Or offers evidence and reasons contradictory to the thesis. |
|
Tone |
Makes
claims about meaning in a convincing manner that may lend more
credence than correctness to the argument. Uses appropriate tone to
maintain credence. |
Makes
claims about meaning that are mostly convincing, if somewhat weak,
because of less skilled use of language and/or tone. |
Makes
few or weak claims resulting from: the general nature of the claims,
inadequate writing, failure to develop argument, or weak control of
tone undermining credence. |
Makes
few and weak claims that are inadequately written, undeveloped, and/or
presented in a tone that undermines the writer’s credibility. |
|
Conventions |
Command of conventions exhibited. |
Correct use of conventions and grammar, for the most part, exhibited. |
Weak
control of conventions and grammar is distracting. |
Conventions and grammar impede understanding. |
|
Format |
Format is appropriate for an editorial or commentary. |
Format is appropriate for the genre. |
Format may be appropriate but is executed carelessly. |
Format may be inappropriate or executed carelessly. |